-- dump date   	20240506_152430
-- class       	Genbank::misc_RNA
-- table       	misc_rna_note
-- id	note
9606000001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 106 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 239 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 272 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 209 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 209 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 522 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 218 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606000105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 118 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606000220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 146 ESTs, 146 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 120 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 249 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 117 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 219 long SRA reads, 29 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 222 long SRA reads, 29 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 292 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 292 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 216 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 64 ESTs, 133 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 134 ESTs, 67 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 61 ESTs, 334 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 382 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 20 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 191 ESTs, 5204 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 133 ESTs, 3139 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 443 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 1703 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 389 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 334 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 ESTs, 458 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 87 ESTs, 1567 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 202 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000563	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 59 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 309 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 84 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 2008 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 285 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 434 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 446 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 1221 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 391 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 1115 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 23 ESTs, 38 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606000759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000781	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 99 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000827	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 116 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 53 ESTs, 354 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 354 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 82 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000910	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606000921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000983	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606000986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000992	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606000999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 79 ESTs, 114 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 140 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 216 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 175 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 154 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 404 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606001136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 111 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 103 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001225	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001226	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001227	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001228	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 64 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 long SRA reads, and 16% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 159 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 141 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 111 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 214 long SRA reads, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 68 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 68 ESTs, 32 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 92 ESTs, 76 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 105 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 75 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 93 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 94 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 153 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001555	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 496 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 340 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 127 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 319 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 56 ESTs, 121 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 251 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 126 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 100 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001696	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 37 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 67 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 35 ESTs, 66 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 110 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 110 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001745	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 86 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 59 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 379 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606001904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 140 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 32 long SRA reads, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606001998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606001999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 637 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 32 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 27 ESTs, 406 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 83 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 227 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 76 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 401 long SRA reads, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 396 long SRA reads, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 630 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 83 ESTs, 225 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 373 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 395 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 69% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 473 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 103 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 167 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 86 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 84 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 84 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 128 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 128 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 275 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 38 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 117 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 117 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 35% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 39 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 33 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 122 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 473 long SRA reads, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 487 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 796 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 381 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 152 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 688 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 331 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 122 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 2439 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 907 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 144 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 96 ESTs, 236 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90 ESTs, 180 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 81 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 11 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 252 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 122 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 86 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 212 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 114 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 84 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 251 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 60 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 68 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 292 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 299 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 180 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 54 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 270 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 234 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 53 ESTs, 568 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 1137 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 195 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 64 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 29 long SRA reads, and 30% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 29 long SRA reads, and 28% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 27% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 38 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 215 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 173 ESTs, 439 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 35 ESTs, 979 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 152 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 54 ESTs, 385 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 37 ESTs, 183 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 210 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 235 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 68 ESTs, 1744 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 ESTs, 130 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 132 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 ESTs, 185 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 55 ESTs, 150 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 90 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 293 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 317 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 23 ESTs, 269 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 27 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 174 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 45 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002880	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002881	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002882	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002883	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002884	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002885	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002886	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002887	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002888	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002889	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 90 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 109 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 152 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 128 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 467 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 115 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 127 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 103 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 102 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 102 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 212 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 96 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606002950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 73 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606002954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 59 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606002996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606002999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 304 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 164 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 129 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 143 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003024	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 172 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 202 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 112 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 275 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 463 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 112 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 176 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 179 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 1212 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 211 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 548 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 296 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606003217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 ESTs, 264 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 54 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 112 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 122 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 103 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 113 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 117 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 110 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 110 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 76 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 78 ESTs, 1383 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 74 ESTs, 1342 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 128 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 92 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein
9606003452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 42 long SRA reads, and 29% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 17 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003495	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 54 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 329 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 243 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 114 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 209 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 175 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 1417 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 203 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 323 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 219 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 960 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 241 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606003628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 81 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 131 ESTs, 566 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 58 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 81 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003695	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 283 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 12 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606003794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 87 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 95 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 1089 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 140 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 2123 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 309 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 181 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 143 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 264 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606003984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 160 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 178 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 268 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606003990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606003999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 447 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 137 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 65 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 299 ESTs, 1296 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 299 ESTs, 1295 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 90 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004111	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 452 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 620 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 95 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 41 ESTs, 578 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 41 ESTs, 582 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 119 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 119 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 75 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 long SRA reads, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 34% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 143 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 124 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 126 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 71 long SRA reads, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 75 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 157 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 141 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004300	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 157 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 148 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 92 long SRA reads, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 94 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 328 ESTs, 5466 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 156 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 328 ESTs, 5550 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 154 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 327 ESTs, 5457 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 141 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 306 ESTs, 1378 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 144 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 306 ESTs, 1385 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 143 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 306 ESTs, 1384 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 132 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 311 ESTs, 1477 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 150 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 310 ESTs, 1372 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 302 ESTs, 1434 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 302 ESTs, 1342 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 131 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 320 ESTs, 1279 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 320 ESTs, 1340 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 147 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 319 ESTs, 1292 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 137 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 303 ESTs, 1335 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 144 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 302 ESTs, 1166 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 300 ESTs, 1114 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 300 ESTs, 1150 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 299 ESTs, 1130 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 294 ESTs, 1110 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 294 ESTs, 1130 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 56% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 40 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 200 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 220 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 143 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 38 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 75 ESTs, 900 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 639 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 120 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 103 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 322 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 370 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 413 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 488 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 344 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 343 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606004920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 344 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 558 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 343 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 557 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 345 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 362 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 362 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606004928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 343 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 50 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 153 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 151 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 155 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 44 ESTs, 347 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 39 ESTs, 225 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606004998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1069 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606004999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1069 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 153 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 799 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 799 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 593 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005143	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 71 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 68% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 304 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 85 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 256 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 307 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 267 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 315 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005231	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 43 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 138 ESTs, 832 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 405 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 390 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 407 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 405 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 405 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 390 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 389 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 407 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, 831 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 long SRA reads, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 Proteins, and 21% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005415	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005416	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005417	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005418	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 long SRA reads, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 176 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 154 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 74 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 54 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 67% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1697 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1689 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1693 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1693 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1685 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 60 ESTs, 1686 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606005755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 1684 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005811	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 59% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 64% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 66 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 28 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 29 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 401 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 52 ESTs, 621 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 727 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 787 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 811 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 ESTs, 554 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 576 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 35 ESTs, 574 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 190 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 131 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 80 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 411 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 413 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 410 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 415 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 414 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606005951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606005992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 86 ESTs, 482 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 87 ESTs, 482 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 86 ESTs, 484 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606005997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 220 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 604 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 69 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 59 ESTs, 72 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 52 ESTs, 246 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 472 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 472 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 472 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 306 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 185 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, 85 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 66 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 162 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 553 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 390 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 188 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 163 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 97 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006353	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006354	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 18 long SRA reads, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 55 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 435 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 432 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 108 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 87 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 98 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 131 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 99 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 115 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 115 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 109 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 98 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 92 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 165 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006552	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006629	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 241 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 150 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 43 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 355 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 355 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006712	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 168 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 62% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 166 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 151 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006772	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 93 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 1604 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 86 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606006881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 54 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 98 ESTs, 192 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 153 ESTs, 296 long SRA reads, 16 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 82 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 147 ESTs, 181 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 87 ESTs, 186 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 107 ESTs, 189 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 86 ESTs, 180 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 36 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606006993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606006994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606006999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 76 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007071	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 138 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 14 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 112 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 413 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 16 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 18 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 18 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 39 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 long SRA reads, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 742 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84 ESTs, 231 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 58 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 770 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 770 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 65 ESTs, 778 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 67 ESTs, 794 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 68 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 877 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 96 ESTs, 885 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 97 ESTs, 876 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 130 ESTs, 938 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 97 ESTs, 913 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 95 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 845 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 94 ESTs, 846 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 94 ESTs, 834 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 95 ESTs, 835 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 157 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 39 ESTs, 152 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 74 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 521 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 108 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606007523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 397 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 2691 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 164 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 142 ESTs, 97 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 39 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 97 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 113 ESTs, 2225 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 95 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007568	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 91 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 144 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 552 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 374 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 249 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 110 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 32 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 159 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 53 ESTs, 96 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 147 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 159 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 171 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 62 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 71 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 71 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 20 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007871	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007872	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007873	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007887	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 182 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 67 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, 64 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 157 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606007989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606007999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 1291 long SRA reads, 17 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 118 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 80 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 82 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 104 ESTs, 129 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 76% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 23 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 26 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 149 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 149 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 161 long SRA reads, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008134	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 330 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 83% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 90 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 30 ESTs, 39 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 30 ESTs, 38 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 74% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008174	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 523 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 565 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 long SRA reads, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 long SRA reads, and 17% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 204 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 193 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 43 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 43 long SRA reads, 12 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 30 ESTs, 1367 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 116 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1385 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 32 ESTs, 1413 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 126 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 97 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 104 ESTs, 155 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 104 ESTs, 132 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 1032 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 884 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 245 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 759 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 128 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 132 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 357 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 74 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008652	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 61 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 611 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606008721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 623 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 58 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 462 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 188 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 335 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 312 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 320 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606008994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606008999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 37 ESTs, 92 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 95 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 40 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 149 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 197 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 114 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 86 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 95 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 61 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 239 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 127 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 95 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 22 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 103 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 36 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 32 ESTs, 248 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 580 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 137 ESTs, 252 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 72 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 1361 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 1079 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 138 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 482 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 14 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 176 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 93 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 201 long SRA reads, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 126 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 95 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 67 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 67 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 912 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 558 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 611 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 54 ESTs, 141 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 657 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 87 ESTs, 210 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 138 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 65 ESTs, 174 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 109 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 57% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 136 ESTs, 167 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 640 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 981 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 488 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 176 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 185 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 93 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 93 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 60 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 66 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 7 long SRA reads, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 212 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 237 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 141 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 151 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 63 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 121 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 121 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009646	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 208 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 209 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1129 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1560 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 88 ESTs, 578 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 162 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 30 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 102 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 269 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 189 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 120 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 mRNAs, 70 ESTs, 845 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 328 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 53 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 54 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 237 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 239 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 1300 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 19 ESTs, 1584 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606009984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 18 ESTs, 1043 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606009991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606009999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 53 ESTs, 791 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 55 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 178 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 169 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 1445 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 114 ESTs, 1438 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 370 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 109 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 267 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 127 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 90 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 95 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 78 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 30 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 120 ESTs, 166 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010176	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 243 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 98 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 54 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 193 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010243	The RefSeq transcript has 31 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010244	The RefSeq transcript has 32 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 83 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 83 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606010364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 236 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 270 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 249 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 278 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 29 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 247 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 258 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 233 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 36% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 42 ESTs, 342 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 274 long SRA reads, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 113 ESTs, 47 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 150 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 66 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 78 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 83 long SRA reads, 9 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 21 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606010453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010461	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 48 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 273 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 291 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 245 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 311 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 64 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 119 ESTs, 291 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 136 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 6 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 6 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 25 ESTs, 1666 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 160 ESTs, 356 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 158 ESTs, 238 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 159 ESTs, 369 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 174 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010695	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 88 ESTs, 92 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 272 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 327 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 248 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 249 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 291 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 291 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010752	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 2489 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 83 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 181 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 85 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606010815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606010845	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 13% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 225 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 260 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 257 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 437 ESTs, 590 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 89 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 43 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010934	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010935	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 94 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 619 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 51 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 51% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 168 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606010990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606010999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1835 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 2068 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 300 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 305 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 145 ESTs, 192 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 119 ESTs, 255 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 106 ESTs, 145 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 570 ESTs, 708 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 426 ESTs, 166 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 179 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 38 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011126	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011147	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 124 ESTs, 99 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 26 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011165	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 361 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 119 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 359 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 84 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 359 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 361 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 271 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606011206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 28 ESTs, 192 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 mRNAs, 26 ESTs, 386 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 132 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 101 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 26 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 348 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 601 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 149 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 24 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 162 ESTs, 152 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 161 ESTs, 147 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 160 ESTs, 145 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 160 ESTs, 145 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 113 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 65 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 98 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 61 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 41% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, and 39% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 31 ESTs, 1052 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 76 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 52 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 33 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 38 long SRA reads, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 278 long SRA reads, 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 194 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 180 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 76 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 200 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 67 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 51 ESTs, 165 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 132 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 190 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 128 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 48 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 34 ESTs, 132 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 77 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 34 ESTs, 159 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 55 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 ESTs, 198 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 42 ESTs, 2696 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 73% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 2545 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 2545 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 105 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 82 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 91 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 461 long SRA reads, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 148 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 70 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 Protein, and 61% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606011529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 106 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 105 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 61 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 109 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 79 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 79 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 70 ESTs, 353 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 24 ESTs, 201 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 172 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 49 ESTs, 98 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 72 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 72 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 72 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 144 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 91 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011694	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 59 ESTs, 461 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011710	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 5 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011755	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011756	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011777	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011778	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011779	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 mRNAs, 16 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 79 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 36 ESTs, 767 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 626 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 608 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 800 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 621 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 612 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 965 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 621 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 58 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 800 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 47 ESTs, 807 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 654 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 41 ESTs, 1951 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 129 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1377 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 51 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 440 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 35 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 1405 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 446 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 2247 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 484 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 130 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 482 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 830 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 114 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 1479 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 79 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 58 ESTs, 757 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 59 ESTs, 755 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 57 ESTs, 598 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 37 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011885	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011889	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606011918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011937	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 171 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 140 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 57 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606011967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606011999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 59 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 59 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 56 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012019	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012020	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012021	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012022	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 199 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 188 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012066	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012068	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012069	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012070	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012071	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012073	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012075	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012076	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012077	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012078	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012082	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 50 long SRA reads, and 46% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 9 ESTs, 21 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012152	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012154	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012159	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 43 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 44 ESTs, 131 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 98 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 132 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 ESTs, 98 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 53 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012229	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 17 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 96 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 50 ESTs, 173 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, and 50% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606012243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 ESTs, 37 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012252	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 9 ESTs, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012313	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012320	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012332	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012333	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 18 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 21 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 33 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 40 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 32 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 88 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 130 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 102 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 99 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 22 ESTs, 365 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 246 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 245 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 63% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 248 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 66% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 163 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 18 ESTs, 239 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 17 ESTs, 141 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 ESTs, 107 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 536 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 33 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 8 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012485	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012489	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606012492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012499	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012507	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012508	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 131 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012509	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012510	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012515	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012516	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012517	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012518	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012519	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012520	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012521	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012522	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 121 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 75% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 18 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012523	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012524	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012525	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012528	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012537	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012538	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012549	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 42 ESTs, 116 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 32 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 39 ESTs, 102 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012552	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012553	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012558	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012559	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012560	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012562	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012564	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012571	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012572	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012573	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012577	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 145 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012583	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 104 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 38% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012621	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012622	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012623	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 439 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012624	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012625	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012626	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012627	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012628	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012636	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 315 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 long SRA reads, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 25 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012655	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606012662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012671	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 16 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 34 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 63 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 68 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606012687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 126 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606012688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012697	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012701	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012703	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012705	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012706	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012707	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012708	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012711	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 164 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012730	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, and 53% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 23 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012733	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 151 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012734	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 135 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 5 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012752	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012753	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 40 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 169 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 280 long SRA reads, 5 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012769	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 242 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 239 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 20 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012776	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012783	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012796	The RefSeq transcript has 26 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012797	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 20 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 31 ESTs, 157 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012829	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012832	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012833	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012834	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012839	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012849	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012855	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012856	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012858	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012862	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012869	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012870	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012874	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012875	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012881	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012882	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012894	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012895	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 45 ESTs, 255 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 59 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 324 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 86 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012897	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 277 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012901	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 51 ESTs, 228 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 46 ESTs, 170 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 51 ESTs, 193 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 49 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 242 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 49 ESTs, 220 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 46 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 55 ESTs, 270 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 63 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 40 ESTs, 328 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 73 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012913	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 40 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 71 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012916	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012917	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 10 long SRA reads, and 70% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012931	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 40 ESTs, 144 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012951	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012953	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 58% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012959	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012964	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 34 ESTs, 63 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 15 ESTs, 262 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 111 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 10 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606012988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 56 ESTs, 746 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 37 ESTs, 786 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 88% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606012991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012998	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606012999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013001	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013002	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013005	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 45 ESTs, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 29 ESTs, 256 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013029	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 ESTs, 43 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 26 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013038	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013039	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013040	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013041	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013042	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013043	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013044	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 21 ESTs, 165 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 101 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 124 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 14 ESTs, 154 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 45 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 38 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013051	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013054	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013055	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013056	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013057	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013058	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013059	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013060	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013061	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013062	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013063	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013064	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013065	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606013067	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013072	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 17 ESTs, 48 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 27 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013074	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013079	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013080	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013081	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 68 ESTs, 137 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 ESTs, 132 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013097	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013104	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013105	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013106	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013109	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 43 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013110	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013111	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013112	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013113	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013115	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013116	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013117	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013118	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013121	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013122	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013123	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 50 ESTs, 212 long SRA reads, 84 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013127	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013128	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013129	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013130	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013131	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013132	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013133	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 204 ESTs, 222 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 203 ESTs, 218 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 204 ESTs, 199 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 22 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013137	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013142	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013143	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013144	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013145	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013146	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013149	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013150	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013151	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013153	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013157	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013158	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013160	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 65 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013161	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013162	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013163	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013166	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013171	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013172	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 4 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013177	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013178	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 47% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606013183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013189	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013190	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013191	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013192	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 134 ESTs, 393 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 139 ESTs, 419 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013208	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013209	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013211	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013212	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013219	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013220	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013223	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013224	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013225	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013226	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013227	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013228	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013230	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013231	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013232	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013233	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 211 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 72% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013234	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013235	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013236	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013237	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013238	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013239	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013240	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 20 ESTs, 89 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 92 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 22 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013251	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013253	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013254	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013255	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013256	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 14 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 62 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013257	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013258	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013262	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013272	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013280	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013281	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013282	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013283	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 46 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013284	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013285	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013287	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013289	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013296	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013297	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013298	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013299	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013300	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013301	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013302	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013303	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013306	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013307	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013308	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013309	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013310	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013311	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013312	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013313	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013314	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013315	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 52 ESTs, 1070 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 54 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013321	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013322	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013323	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 786 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 30 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013326	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013327	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013329	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013331	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 14 ESTs, 29 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 14 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013334	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013335	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013336	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013337	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013338	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1299 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606013342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013343	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013344	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 24 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 41 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013351	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013354	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013361	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013362	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 27 ESTs, 16 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013363	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013364	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013373	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013374	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013375	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013376	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013377	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013378	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013379	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013380	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013381	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013382	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013383	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013384	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013385	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013386	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013396	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013397	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013399	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013400	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013401	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013402	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013403	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013405	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013406	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013407	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013408	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013409	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013410	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013411	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013412	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013413	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013418	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013429	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013430	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013431	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013434	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013437	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013439	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013440	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013442	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013443	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013444	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013445	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013446	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013447	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013448	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013449	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013450	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013451	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013452	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013453	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013454	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 465 long SRA reads, 85 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 13 ESTs, 488 long SRA reads, 85 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013463	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013464	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013470	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013471	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 2 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013472	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013473	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013474	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013475	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013476	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013479	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013480	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013484	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013490	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013504	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013505	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013506	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013507	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013508	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013509	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013510	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013511	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013512	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013514	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013519	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013521	The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013522	The RefSeq transcript has 18 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013524	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013525	The RefSeq transcript has 39 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013526	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013527	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013528	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 33% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013529	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 long SRA reads, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 long SRA reads, and 60% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013534	The RefSeq transcript has 22 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013535	The RefSeq transcript has 23 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013536	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013537	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013538	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013539	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 141 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013543	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013544	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013546	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013548	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013550	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013551	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013552	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 30% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013553	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 17% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013554	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 15% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013569	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 52 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013571	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013572	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013573	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013574	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013575	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013576	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013577	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013578	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013579	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013581	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 ESTs, 4 Proteins, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013582	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 120 long SRA reads, 15 Proteins, and 86% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013583	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 8% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013584	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 79 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013586	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013587	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 219 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 28 ESTs, 2008 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, 219 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 140 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013593	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 83% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013594	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 83% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013595	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 74% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013614	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013616	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 83% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013617	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013618	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013620	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013621	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013622	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013623	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013624	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013625	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013626	The RefSeq transcript has 16 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013627	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013628	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013629	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013630	The RefSeq transcript has 66 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013631	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013632	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013633	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 45% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013634	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013635	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013636	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013637	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013639	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013640	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 ESTs, 99 long SRA reads, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013644	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 27 ESTs, 77 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 60 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013645	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, and 78% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 47 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013646	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013647	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013648	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, 11 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013649	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, 13 Proteins, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013650	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013651	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013652	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013653	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013656	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 25 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013658	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 66 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 44 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013664	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 89% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013665	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 89% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013666	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 89% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013668	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013670	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013671	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 73% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013672	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 69% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013673	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013674	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013678	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013679	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013680	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013682	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013683	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013686	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013687	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013689	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013693	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 87% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013694	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 82% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013695	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 83% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013696	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 8% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013697	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 8% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013699	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013700	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013701	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013702	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013703	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013704	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013705	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013706	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013707	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013708	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013709	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013710	The RefSeq transcript has 6 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013711	The RefSeq transcript has 6 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013712	The RefSeq transcript has 6 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013713	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 1 EST, 2 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 38 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013716	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013731	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 88 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013732	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013735	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 28 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013738	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013740	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013741	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013745	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, and 71% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013747	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013748	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013749	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013750	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013751	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 22 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 39 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013765	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 72% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013766	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013768	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 53 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013771	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 111 long SRA reads, and 93% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013772	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 67 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 69 long SRA reads, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 67 long SRA reads, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 56 long SRA reads, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013780	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013781	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 14% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013782	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013783	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013792	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 95% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013795	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013796	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013798	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013799	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013800	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013801	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013802	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013803	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013804	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013805	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013806	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 204 ESTs, 74 long SRA reads, and 87% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 81 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013807	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013808	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013810	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013813	The RefSeq transcript has 54 substitutions, 9 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 12% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013814	The RefSeq transcript has 53 substitutions, 8 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 12% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 85% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 11 ESTs, 11 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 31 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 20 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013819	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 16 ESTs, 27 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013822	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 82% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 32% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606013824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013825	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013826	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013830	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013831	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 20 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 93 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013832	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013833	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013834	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013835	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 136 ESTs, 167 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013845	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013846	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013848	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013849	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013850	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013851	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013852	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606013853	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013854	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013855	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013856	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013857	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013858	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013862	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013863	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 21% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013864	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013865	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013866	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013868	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013869	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013870	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013871	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013873	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013874	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013875	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013877	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013878	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013879	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013881	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013882	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013883	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013884	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013885	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013886	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013887	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013889	The RefSeq transcript has 46 substitutions, 6 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 88% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013890	The RefSeq transcript has 15 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013892	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013893	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013894	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013895	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013897	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013898	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013899	The RefSeq transcript has 32 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013900	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013901	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013902	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013903	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 158 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 82% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013904	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013905	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 76% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013906	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 74% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013910	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013913	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013914	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 12 ESTs, 57 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 102 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013915	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 5 ESTs, 42 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 75 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013916	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013917	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 20 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 17 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606013920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 29 ESTs, 54 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 36 long SRA reads, 8 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013929	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013930	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013931	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013934	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013935	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013936	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013937	The RefSeq transcript has 13 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013941	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013942	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013949	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 48% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013950	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013951	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 66% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013953	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013954	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013955	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013959	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013960	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013961	The RefSeq transcript has 50 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013962	The RefSeq transcript has 46 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 96% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013963	The RefSeq transcript has 55 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013964	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013965	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013966	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013975	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 44 ESTs, 273 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 77% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606013976	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013977	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013978	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013979	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013980	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013981	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013982	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013983	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013984	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013985	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013986	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013987	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013988	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013989	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013990	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013991	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013992	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013993	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013994	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013995	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013996	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013997	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013998	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 34% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606013999	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014000	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014001	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 61% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014002	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 60% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014003	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014004	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014005	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014006	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014007	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014008	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, 19 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014009	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 7 ESTs, 41 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014010	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 45 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014011	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 6 ESTs, 49 long SRA reads, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014012	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014013	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014014	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 4 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014015	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014016	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014017	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014018	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014019	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 19% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014020	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 19% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014021	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 15% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014022	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 14% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014023	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014024	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014025	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014026	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014027	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014028	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014029	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014030	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 47 Proteins, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606014031	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014032	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014033	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014034	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014035	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014036	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014037	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014038	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions and aligns at 91% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014039	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 93% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014040	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 91% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014041	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 93% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014042	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 93% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014043	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 91% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014044	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 93% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014045	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014046	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014047	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014048	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014049	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014050	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014052	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 136 long SRA reads, 14 Proteins, and 79% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606014053	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014054	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014055	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014063	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014064	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014075	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014076	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014077	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014078	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014079	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014080	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014081	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014082	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 15 ESTs, 53 long SRA reads, and 65% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 69 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014083	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014084	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014085	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014086	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014087	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 80% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014088	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014089	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014090	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014091	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014092	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014093	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014094	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014095	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014096	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 98% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014098	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014099	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 81% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014100	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014101	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 38 ESTs, 272 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 126 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014102	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014103	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014104	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014105	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014106	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 32% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014107	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014108	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014109	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014114	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014119	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014120	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014123	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 57% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014124	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014125	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014126	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 70% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014127	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 85% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014128	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 35% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014129	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 75% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014130	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014131	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 32% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014132	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 60% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014133	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 72% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014134	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014135	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014136	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014137	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 13% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014138	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 26 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014139	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014140	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 21 ESTs, 35 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014141	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014142	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014143	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014144	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014145	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014147	The RefSeq transcript has 13 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014148	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014149	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 75% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014150	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions and aligns at 67% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014151	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 37% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014152	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014153	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014154	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014155	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014156	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 23 ESTs, 100 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 21 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014157	The RefSeq transcript has 13 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014158	The RefSeq transcript has 24 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014159	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014160	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014161	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014162	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014163	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014164	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014165	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 49% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014166	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014167	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014168	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014169	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014170	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014171	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014172	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and aligns at 73% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014173	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014174	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014175	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014176	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014177	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 51% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014178	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 50% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014179	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014180	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014181	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014182	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014183	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606014184	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 793 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014185	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 793 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014186	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 590 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 9 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014187	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 590 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 16 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014188	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 793 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 72 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014191	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 39% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014192	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 32% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014193	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014194	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014195	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014196	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014197	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014198	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014199	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014200	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014201	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014202	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014203	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014204	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014205	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014206	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014207	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014208	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014209	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and aligns at 77% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014210	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 23 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014211	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014212	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014213	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014214	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014215	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014216	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014217	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014218	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014219	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014220	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014221	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014222	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014228	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 36% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014229	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 67% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014231	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014232	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014233	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014234	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014235	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014236	The RefSeq transcript has 22 substitutions, 6 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 48% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014237	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014238	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 43% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014239	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 35% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014240	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 39% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014241	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014242	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014243	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014244	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014245	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014246	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014247	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014248	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014249	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014250	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014251	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 62% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014252	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 87% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014253	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 76% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014254	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014255	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014256	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014257	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014258	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014259	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014260	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014261	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014262	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014263	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 3 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014264	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014265	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014266	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014267	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014268	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014269	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014270	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014271	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014272	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014273	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014274	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014275	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014276	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014277	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 14 ESTs, 8 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014278	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014279	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014280	The RefSeq transcript has 23 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014281	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014282	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014283	The RefSeq transcript has 16 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014284	The RefSeq transcript has 26 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014285	The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014286	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014287	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014288	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014289	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014290	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014291	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014292	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606014293	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014294	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014295	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014296	The RefSeq transcript has 43 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014297	The RefSeq transcript has 43 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014298	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 49% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014299	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 49% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014300	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 51% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014301	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 48% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014302	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 47% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014303	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014304	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014305	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014306	The RefSeq transcript has 18 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014307	The RefSeq transcript has 15 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014308	The RefSeq transcript has 66 substitutions, 13 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014309	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014310	The RefSeq transcript has 69 substitutions, 15 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014311	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014312	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014313	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014314	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014315	The RefSeq transcript has 17 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014316	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014317	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014318	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 6 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014319	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014324	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014325	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014326	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014328	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014329	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 19% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014330	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 10 long SRA reads, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014331	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014332	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014333	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014334	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014335	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014336	The RefSeq transcript has 124 substitutions, 13 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 15% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014337	The RefSeq transcript has 60 substitutions, 7 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 10% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014338	The RefSeq transcript has 122 substitutions, 12 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 14% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014339	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 92% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014340	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014341	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014342	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014344	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 92% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014345	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014346	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014347	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014348	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014349	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014350	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014351	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014352	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014353	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014354	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014355	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014356	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014357	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014358	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014359	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014360	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014363	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014364	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014365	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014366	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 ESTs, 13 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 40 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014367	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014368	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014369	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014370	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 25 ESTs, 300 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 94 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014371	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 26 ESTs, 305 long SRA reads, 3 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 140 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014372	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014373	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014374	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014375	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014376	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014377	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014378	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014379	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014380	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014381	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014382	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014383	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014384	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014385	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014386	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014387	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014388	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014389	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 8 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014390	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 7 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014391	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014392	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014393	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014394	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014395	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014396	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014397	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014398	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 31 ESTs, 79 long SRA reads, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014399	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014404	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, 6 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014406	The RefSeq transcript has 18 substitutions, 11 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014407	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014414	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 13 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014415	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 25 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 42 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014416	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 5 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 12 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014417	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 17 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 70 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014418	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014419	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014420	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 54% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014421	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014422	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014423	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014424	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014425	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014426	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014427	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014428	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 22 ESTs, 34 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 10 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014431	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014432	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 ESTs, 15 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014433	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 12 long SRA reads, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014434	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014435	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014436	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014437	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014438	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014441	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 24 long SRA reads, and 90% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014449	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014450	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014451	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014452	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014453	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014454	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014455	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014456	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 long SRA read, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014457	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014458	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014459	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014460	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014461	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014462	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 7 ESTs, 5 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014463	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014464	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014465	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 10 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 19 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014466	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 mRNAs, 2 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014467	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 mRNAs, 4 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014468	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014469	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 32 mRNAs, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 12 Proteins, and 99% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014470	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014471	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014472	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014473	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014474	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014475	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014476	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014477	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014478	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014479	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014480	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014481	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014482	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014483	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014484	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 14% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014485	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014486	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 8 mRNAs, 48 ESTs, 2131 long SRA reads, 7 Proteins, and 95% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 124 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014487	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014488	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014489	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014490	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014491	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014492	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014493	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014494	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014495	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014496	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014497	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014498	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014499	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014500	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014501	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014502	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014503	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014504	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014505	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014506	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014507	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014508	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014509	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014510	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014511	The RefSeq transcript has 66 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014512	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014513	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014514	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014515	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014518	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014519	The RefSeq transcript has 13 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014520	The RefSeq transcript has 24 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014521	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014522	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014523	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014524	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014525	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014526	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014527	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014528	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014529	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014530	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014531	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014532	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014533	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014534	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014535	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014536	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014537	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014538	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014539	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014540	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014541	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014542	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014543	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014544	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014545	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014546	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014547	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014548	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014549	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014550	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014551	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014552	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014553	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014554	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 18 ESTs, 31 long SRA reads, and 55% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 44 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014555	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 4 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014556	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 96% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014557	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 long SRA reads, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014558	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 95% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014559	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions and aligns at 95% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014560	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014561	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014562	The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions, 5 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 9% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014563	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014564	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014565	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 11 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014566	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 12 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 97% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014567	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 10 Proteins, and 52% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments
9606014568	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 6 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 7 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014569	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014570	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014571	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014572	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014573	The RefSeq transcript has 9 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 19% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014576	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014577	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014578	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 21% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014579	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014580	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014581	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014582	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014583	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014584	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014585	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014586	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014587	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014588	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014589	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014590	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014591	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014592	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014593	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014594	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014595	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014596	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014597	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014598	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014599	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014600	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014601	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014602	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014603	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014604	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014605	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014606	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014607	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014608	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014609	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 12 ESTs, 10 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014610	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 13 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014611	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014612	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014613	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014614	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 11 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014615	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014616	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014617	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 61% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014618	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014619	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014629	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014630	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014631	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 Protein, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014632	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014633	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014634	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014635	The RefSeq transcript has 29 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014636	The RefSeq transcript has 29 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014637	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014638	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014639	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014640	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014641	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014642	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014643	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014646	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014647	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014648	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014649	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014650	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014651	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014652	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014653	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014654	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014655	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014656	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014657	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014658	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014659	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014660	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014661	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014662	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014663	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014664	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014665	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014666	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014667	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014668	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014669	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014670	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014671	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014672	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014673	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014674	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014675	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014676	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014677	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014678	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014679	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014680	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and aligns at 55% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014681	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014682	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 95% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014683	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 95% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014684	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014685	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014686	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014687	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014688	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014689	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014690	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014691	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014692	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014693	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014694	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014695	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014696	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014697	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014698	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 62 long SRA reads, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 15 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014701	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014702	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014703	The RefSeq transcript has 25 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014704	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014705	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014706	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014707	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014708	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014709	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014710	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014711	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014712	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 21 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014713	The RefSeq transcript has 13 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014714	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014715	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014716	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014717	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014718	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014719	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014720	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014721	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014722	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014723	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014724	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014725	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014726	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014727	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014728	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014729	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014730	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014731	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014732	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014733	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014734	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014735	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014736	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014737	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014738	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014739	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014740	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014741	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014742	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014743	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014744	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014745	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014746	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014747	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014748	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014749	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014750	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014751	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014752	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014753	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014754	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014755	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014756	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014757	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014758	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014759	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014760	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014761	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014762	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014763	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014764	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014765	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014766	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014767	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014768	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014769	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014770	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014771	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014772	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014773	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014774	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014775	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014776	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014777	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014778	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014779	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014780	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014781	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 3 mRNAs, 1 EST, 86 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014782	The RefSeq transcript aligns at 45% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014783	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014784	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014785	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014786	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014787	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014788	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014789	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014790	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014791	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014792	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014793	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014794	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014795	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014798	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014799	The RefSeq transcript has 14 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014800	The RefSeq transcript has 25 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014801	The RefSeq transcript has 16 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014802	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014803	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014804	The RefSeq transcript has 12 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014805	The RefSeq transcript has 11 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014806	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014807	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014808	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014809	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 3 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014810	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014811	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 91% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 2 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014812	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014813	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014814	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014815	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014816	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014817	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014818	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014819	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014820	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 long SRA read, and 94% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014821	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014822	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014823	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014824	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014825	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014826	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014827	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014828	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014829	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014830	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014831	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014832	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014833	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014834	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014835	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014836	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014837	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014838	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 4 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014839	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014840	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014841	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014842	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014843	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014844	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014845	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014846	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014847	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014848	The RefSeq transcript has 22 substitutions, 4 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014849	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014850	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014851	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014852	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014853	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014854	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014855	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014856	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014857	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 mRNA, 19 ESTs, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 13 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014858	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014859	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 5 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014860	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014861	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014862	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014863	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014864	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014865	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014866	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014867	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014868	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014869	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014870	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014871	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014872	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014873	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014874	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014875	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014876	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014877	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014878	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014879	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014880	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 mRNAs, 1 EST, 198 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 11 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014881	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014882	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution and aligns at 92% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014883	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014884	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 19 ESTs, 28 long SRA reads, 2 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014885	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014886	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014887	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014888	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 1 long SRA read, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014889	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014890	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014891	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 mRNAs, 15 ESTs, 7 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 36 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014892	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014893	The RefSeq transcript has 32 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 57% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014894	The RefSeq transcript has 32 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels and aligns at 60% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014895	The RefSeq transcript has 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 55% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014896	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014897	The RefSeq transcript has 10 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014898	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014899	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014900	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014901	The RefSeq transcript has 7 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014902	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014903	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014904	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014905	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014906	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014907	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014908	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014909	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014910	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 9 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014911	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014912	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014913	The RefSeq transcript has 5 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel and aligns at 67% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014914	The RefSeq transcript has 8 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014915	The RefSeq transcript has 28 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014916	The RefSeq transcript has 28 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014917	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014918	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014919	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014920	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014921	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014922	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, 1 Protein, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014923	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 1 EST, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 3 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014924	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 2 Proteins, and 84% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 1 sample with support for all annotated introns
9606014925	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 9 ESTs, 7 long SRA reads, and 89% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 24 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014926	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014927	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014928	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 33 mRNAs, 29 ESTs, 12 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 8 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014929	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014930	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014931	The RefSeq transcript has 27 substitutions, 3 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014932	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 62 ESTs, 134 long SRA reads, 4 Proteins, and 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 117 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014933	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014934	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014935	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014936	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014937	The RefSeq transcript has 4 substitutions, 2 non-frameshifting indels compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014938	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014939	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014940	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014941	The RefSeq transcript has 6 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014942	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014943	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014944	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014945	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014946	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014947	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014948	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014949	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014950	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014951	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions, 1 non-frameshifting indel compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014952	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014953	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014954	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014955	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014956	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014957	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014958	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014959	The RefSeq transcript has 1 substitution compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014960	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014961	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014962	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014963	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014964	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions and aligns at 13% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014965	The RefSeq transcript has 3 substitutions compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014966	The RefSeq transcript has 2 substitutions and aligns at 62% coverage compared to this genomic sequence; Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014967	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014968	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014969	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014970	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014971	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014972	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.
9606014973	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: Gnomon. Supporting evidence includes similarity to: 100% coverage of the annotated genomic feature by RNAseq alignments, including 6 samples with support for all annotated introns
9606014974	Derived by automated computational analysis using gene prediction method: BestRefSeq.